NODE 35a20ff4No Subject
bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <remailer@bureau42.ml.org>Wed, 24 Sep 1997 12:53:21 +0800
Subject: A cypherpunks challenge.
Received: from 158.43.192.4 (actually max01-056.enterprise.net) by bath.mail.pipex.net with SMTP (PP); Sat, 20 Sep 1997 15:40:32 +0100
Received: from gateway1.ml.org by mail.ml.org (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA02326 for <visit-our-xxx@ml.org>; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 14:36:08 -0600 (EST)
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 97 14:36:08 EST
From: hucka@eecs.umich.edu
To: visit-our-xxx@ml.org
Subject: Shut up.
Message-Id: <964dffe172ca4d>
Reply-To: postmaster@concentric.net
X-Pmflags: cum-see-me
X-Uidl: 9275163132023367354272390
Comments: Authenticated sender is <root@ml.org>
Shut up.
Do not complain. It's useless.
Just shut up you ignorant fools. The great Semyon Varshavchik has spoken.
ml.org will *never* shut me down.
mrsam@concentric.net
NODE e235f8deRe: (none)
ghio@temp0117.myriad.ml.org (Matthew Ghio)Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:23:50 +0800
This spammer was pissed off at ml.org because they cancelled his account,
so he mailbombed a bunch of people via enterprise.net, an ISP which caters
to spammers.
I drop everything with an X-UIDL or X-PMFLAGS header in it. I don't know
why, but spammers often flag their junkmail as such by putting one of
these lines in it. It sure makes it easy to delete the spam...
bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <remailer@bureau42.ml.org> wrote:
>
> Subject: A cypherpunks challenge.
>
> Received: from 158.43.192.4 (actually max01-056.enterprise.net) by
> bath.mail.pipex.net with SMTP (PP); Sat, 20 Sep 1997 15:40:32 +0100
> Received: from gateway1.ml.org by mail.ml.org (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id
> GAA02326 for <visit-our-xxx@ml.org>; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 14:36:08 -0600 (EST)
> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 97 14:36:08 EST
> From: hucka@eecs.umich.edu
> To: visit-our-xxx@ml.org
> Subject: Shut up.
> Message-Id: <964dffe172ca4d>
> Reply-To: postmaster@concentric.net
> X-Pmflags: cum-see-me
> X-Uidl: 9275163132023367354272390
> Comments: Authenticated sender is <root@ml.org>
>
> Shut up.
>
> Do not complain. It's useless.
>
> Just shut up you ignorant fools. The great Semyon Varshavchik has spoken.
>
> ml.org will *never* shut me down.
>
> mrsam@concentric.net
NODE e28b12f9Re: (none)
Cynthia Brown <cynthb@sonetis.com>Thu, 25 Sep 1997 01:36:55 +0800
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Matthew Ghio wrote:
> I drop everything with an X-UIDL or X-PMFLAGS header in it. I don't know
> why, but spammers often flag their junkmail as such by putting one of
> these lines in it. It sure makes it easy to delete the spam...
>
> bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <remailer@bureau42.ml.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Subject: A cypherpunks challenge.
> >
> > Received: from 158.43.192.4 (actually max01-056.enterprise.net) by
> > bath.mail.pipex.net with SMTP (PP); Sat, 20 Sep 1997 15:40:32 +0100
> > Received: from gateway1.ml.org by mail.ml.org (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id
> > GAA02326 for <visit-our-xxx@ml.org>; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 14:36:08 -0600 (EST)
> > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 97 14:36:08 EST
> > From: hucka@eecs.umich.edu
> > To: visit-our-xxx@ml.org
> > Subject: Shut up.
> > Message-Id: <964dffe172ca4d>
> > Reply-To: postmaster@concentric.net
> > X-Pmflags: cum-see-me
> > X-Uidl: 9275163132023367354272390
> > Comments: Authenticated sender is <root@ml.org>
Another good procmail trigger is the timezone "0600 (EST)", which is a bug
in one of the more commonly used spammer programs.
Cynthia
===============================================================
Cynthia H. Brown, P.Eng.
E-mail: cynthb@iosphere.net | PGP Key: See Home Page
Home Page: http://www.iosphere.net/~cynthb/
Junk mail will be ignored in the order in which it is received.
Klein bottle for rent; enquire within.