// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Stronghold

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 3330e31aRe: Stronghold
Dimitri Vulis reposted parts of the Stronghold/censorship 
drama:

Dimitri: 

This replay continues your artful distortion of the exchanges, 
presumbly to make your best case, yet it still fails to explain
your original beef with Stronghold.

Perhaps this is unfair, but it now appears that you are using 
the disputed censorship issue to cloud your reluctance, or 
inability, to substantiate a fault in Stronghold.

Send me the Stronghold fault, I'll be happy to add it to the 
other crypto-security stuff that wasn't supposed to be published.

This is not meant to defuse the censorship matter, that's still
live ammo.
NODE 375cc2aeRe: Stronghold
John Young <jya@pipeline.com> writes:

> Dimitri Vulis reposted parts of the Stronghold/censorship
> drama:
>
> Dimitri:
>
> This replay continues your artful distortion of the exchanges,
> presumbly to make your best case, yet it still fails to explain
> your original beef with Stronghold.

Correct.  I even deleted one paragraph from the C2Net lawyer letter
which dealt with the nature of my claims.

> Perhaps this is unfair, but it now appears that you are using
> the disputed censorship issue to cloud your reluctance, or
> inability, to substantiate a fault in Stronghold.
>
> Send me the Stronghold fault, I'll be happy to add it to the
> other crypto-security stuff that wasn't supposed to be published.
>
> This is not meant to defuse the censorship matter, that's still
> live ammo.

Sorry, no, as this would likely cause C2Net to sue me, as they've threatened.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps