NODE 8e2907b0[FWD] Re: Burnore preworthily larine circumgyrate (Who Care?)
Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>Fri, 31 Oct 1997 05:47:26 +0800
Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@netcom.com> whined:
> Funny. Of course, databasix.com has been DOWN SINCE AUGUST BECAUSE OF A
> MOVE. The shit you see abouve comes from the anon asshole trying to see
> if Burnore and DataBasix and other keywords are being blocked by anon
> remailers. I've seen it before.
I'm sure Ron Guilmette (who you've accused elsewhere of doing this) would be smart enough to know that it doesn't take dozens of posts every day containing those keywords to detect blocking, if any. OTOH, the fact that the "abuse"
does seem to fit such a nice, tidy pattern does imply that an easy way to
stop it would be to block any anonymous posts that mention Gary Burnore,
DataBasix, etc. Could that be the real purpose of this nonsense? Do you know
anyone who'd like to see all anonymous posts that mention Gary Burnore and/or
DataBasix blocked? Perhaps someone who chronically refers to remailer users
as "anon assholes"?
Of course, the databasix.com domain being down is irrelevant. You still
have sufficient Internet access through Netcom to do what's being done, so
your alibi is meaningless.
> Such an amazing coincidence that the software given freely by
> mai1to:rfg@monkeys.com (aka mai1to:support@e-scrub.com and
> mai1to:sales@escrub.com) makes the above output possible.
It's even more amazing that you'd just happen to know what sort of software
was being used to generate the messages, isn't it? And if it's "freely
available", as you say, then even you could have obtained a copy. You
certainly seem to be familiar with its capabilities.
Why would Ron allegedly have to use this special software just to test a few
keywords (especially if using his own software would implicate himself)? And
if he is supposedly using the remailers for "harassment", why would he do
something designed to get them shut down? I don't recall him posting
anti-remailer tirades and harassing remailer operators (such as Jeff
Burchell) as you've done.
Or could it be that you're trying to flood the search engines with references
to certain keywords so that it's difficult to search for posts related to
you, DataBasix, and your tactics?
And did you insert all of those "mail to:" URLs into your post to get Ron
Guilmette spam-baited, or did you hope I'd quote them verbatim and thus get
my post blocked by some automated filter mechanism?
--
Without censorship, things can get terribly confused in the public mind.
-- General William Westmoreland
NODE 44ce2e3dRemailer Announcement
"Dirty Dave's ISP" <ddi@dave.nul>Fri, 31 Oct 1997 08:24:28 +0800
Announcement:
DIRTY DAVE'S ISP ANNOUNCES CHANGE OF REMAILERS!
-----------------------------------------------
We at Dirty Dave's ISP would like to apologize for the activities of
the 'TruthMailer' operator, who has allowed his system, and ours,
to be abused by religious fanatics and minors seeking information on
mainstream christian cults
NODE 11b64debRemailer Announcements
Family Values ISP <fvi@null.dev>Fri, 31 Oct 1997 08:24:56 +0800
Announcement:
FAMILY VALUES ISP ANNOUNCES CHANGE OF REMAILERS!
------------------------------------------------
We at Family Values ISP would like to apologize for the activities of
the 'Bad Remailer' operators, who have allowed their system, and ours,
to be abused by foul-mouthed swine and minors seeking information on
venereal diseases.
We initially had our doubts about the operators of the 'Bad Remailer',
based on their name alone, but we gave them the benefit of the doubt,
as good Christians are wont to do. (Have you seen the word 'wont' in
any other posts today?)
Although we are sad that our confidence was betrayed by the operators
of the 'Bad Remailer', we are pleased to announce that we have replaced
their services with those of the 'TruthMailer'.
We are confident that this change will be a positive one which will
result in better service to our customers, with less potential of
abuse by the remailer users.
Famiry Varues ISP
--
Without censorship, things can get terribly confused in the public mind.
-- General William Westmoreland