3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child
Tim May implied that Cpunx should develop non-conventional email. Crypto has been declared to be munitions. Nukes are non-conventional weapons. Should we be developing nuclear email? Should we 'email-nuke DC?" Prespiring minds want to know...
In <199710171449.QAA09086@basement.replay.com>, on 10/17/97 at 04, nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) said: >Tim May implied that Cpunx should develop non-conventional email. Crypto >has been declared to be munitions. >Nukes are non-conventional weapons. >Should we be developing nuclear email? >Should we 'email-nuke DC?" I'm not fussy, standard nuke of DC will work just fine. :) -- --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Anonymous writes: > >Tim May implied that Cpunx should develop non-conventional email. Crypto > >has been declared to be munitions. > >Nukes are non-conventional weapons. > >Should we be developing nuclear email? > >Should we 'email-nuke DC?" Just email them "nuke.fab" :-) (Readers won't understand that unless they read my contribution to the true story of the internet). Adam