Clinton on Forces of Destruction and Illicit Arms

Excerpt from the President's remarks to the Democratic National
Committee in Sacramento this afternoon:

...
             But the most likely problems -- there are a couple 
little babies in this audience, or there were today, and some 
children -- the most likely problems these children will face 
when they come of age will be problems that cross national 
borders -- terrorism, organized crime and drug running, the 
spread of weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological 
weapons and maybe small-scale nuclear weapons.
             
             This much nuclear cake put in a bomb would do ten 
times as much damage as the Oklahoma City bomb did.  
             
             The spread of environmental problems or diseases 
across national lines -- we are going to have to, in other words, 
find ways to cooperate, to keep the organized forces of 
destruction that are taking advantage of the Internet, the 
technological revolution, the freedom of travel and the freedom 
of movement, access to computers and moving money around and all 
that -- there will always be organized forces of destruction.  
             
             That is fundamentally what is at stake in the stand 
off we're having in Iraq today.  I don't want you to look at this 
backward through the prism of the Gulf War and think it's a 
replay.  I want you to look at it forward and think about it in 
terms of the innocent Japanese people that died in the subway 
when the saran gas was released; and how important it is for 
every responsible government in the world to do everything that 
can possibly be done not to let big stores of chemical or 
biological weapons fall into the wrong hands, not to let 
irresponsible people develop the capacity to put them in warheads 
on missiles or put them in briefcases that could be exploded in 
small rooms.  
             
             And I say this not to frighten you.  The world will 
always have challenges.  I think the chances are quite good that 
we can organize ourselves for this challenge and deal with it 
very effectively.  I personally believe that the next 50 years 
will be far more peaceful and less dangerous for our children and 
our grandchildren than the last 50 years were.  I also believe 
they will be the most prosperous and interesting time in all of 
human history -- but only if we do the right things.

...

From: http://library.whitehouse.gov/ThisWeek-plain.cgi

----------

For more on the US ban of assault weapons and the US and Mexico's 
convention to fight illicit arms trafficking, signed yesterday:

   http://jya.com/piat111597.htm

At 6:16 PM -0700 11/15/97, John Young wrote:
>Excerpt from the President's remarks to the Democratic National
>Committee in Sacramento this afternoon:
>
>...
>             But the most likely problems -- there are a couple
>little babies in this audience, or there were today, and some
>children -- the most likely problems these children will face

"Save the children."

"If rolling over the Second Amendment saves the life of just one child...if
rolling over the First saves the life of just one child..."


--Tim May

The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^2,976,221   | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."

John Young wrote:
> Excerpt from the President's remarks to the Democratic National
> Committee in Sacramento this afternoon:
> ...
>              But the most likely problems -- there are a couple
> little babies in this audience, or there were today, and some
> children -- the most likely problems these children will face
> when they come of age will be problems that cross national
> borders -- terrorism, organized crime and drug running, the
> spread of weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological
> weapons and maybe small-scale nuclear weapons.

  If a New World Order saves the life of just one child...

>              The spread of environmental problems or diseases
> across national lines -- we are going to have to, in other words,
> find ways to cooperate, to keep the organized forces of
> destruction that are taking advantage of the Internet, the
> technological revolution, the freedom of travel and the freedom
> of movement, access to computers and moving money around and all
> that -- there will always be organized forces of destruction.

  Anyone that's ever looked at a voting ballot can tell you he
speaks the truth about the forces of organized destruction being
with us forever.

  I've always said that Freedom of Movement was one of the main
reasons for the rapid decline of society. It's all that moving
around that people do between their work desks and their beds
at home that is the problem. Increased use of prison labor has
certainly proven that a War on Movement is a viable option.

  If we allow people to move their money around wherever they
want, as if it is really theirs, then the next thing you know,
they might start doing the things they want with the money
they earn, instead of what they are required to do with it.
  If we allow people to access computers, the organized forces
of destruction will use them to get an education, earn a living,
entertain themselves, and conspire to move around.

>              That is fundamentally what is at stake in the stand
> off we're having in Iraq today. 

(Summary, so far:)
	CHILDREN AND BABIES 
cross national borders	{DANGEROUS MOVEMENT!!!}
	TERRORISM / ORGANIZED CRIME / DRUG RUNNING 
the spread of		{DANGEROUS MOVEMENT!!!}
	WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION / CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS
 	SMALL-SCALE NUCLEAR WEAPONS
across national lines	{DANGEROUS MOVEMENT!!!}
	ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS OR DISEASES
ORGANIZED FORCES OF DESTRUCTION TAKING ADVANTAGE OF 
	the Internet
ORGANIZED FORCES OF DESTRUCTION TAKING ADVANTAGE OF 
	the technological REVOLUTION
ORGANIZED FORCES OF DESTRUCTION TAKING ADVANTAGE OF 
	freedom of travel	{DANGEROUS MOVEMENT!!!}
ORGANIZED FORCES OF DESTRUCTION TAKING ADVANTAGE OF 
	freedom of movement	{DANGEROUS MOVEMENT!!!}
ORGANIZED FORCES OF DESTRUCTION TAKING ADVANTAGE OF 
	access to computers	{DANGEROUS MOVEMENT!!!}
ORGANIZED FORCES OF DESTRUCTION TAKING ADVANTAGE OF
	moving money around	{DANGEROUS MOVEMENT!!!}
ORGANIZED FORCES OF DESTRUCTION TAKING ADVANTAGE OF
	and all that	{EVERYTHING IMAGINABLE!!!}
		ORGANIZED FORCES OF DESTRUCTION!!! 
			IRAQ!!!

>              And I say this not to frighten you. 

  Stand-up comedy at its finest.

> I think the chances are quite good that
> we can organize ourselves for this challenge and deal with it
> very effectively.  

  "We" being the elite "across national borders" and "across
national lines"--the elite of the WORLD.
  "Organize ourselves" meaning: creating a NEW ORDER of organized
authority, laws and government.
  
> I personally believe that the next 50 years
> will be far more peaceful and less dangerous for our children and
> our grandchildren than the last 50 years were.

  I *knew* he was going to mention children a couple more times
after the scare tactics. Am I goddamn *psychic*, or what?

>  I also believe
> they will be the most prosperous and interesting time in all of
> human history -- but only if we do the right things.

  Translation~~"Only" those who "do the right things" are going to
find the NEW WORLD ORDER future "prosperous" and "interesting."

	BILLION DOLLAR CHALLENGE!!!
  If any of you can read this speech by El Presidante and think of
those who spoke out against the National Socialists, the brownshirts,
the Nazis--at the same time--and not get a shiver down your spine...
  I will give you a check for $1,000,000,000 (postdated Jan 1, 2000).

OrganizedTruthMonster