NODE b4f46cdbRe: [news] TV station sets cybersex sting
Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>Thu, 6 Nov 1997 11:40:32 +0800
>*** TV station sets cybersex sting
>With cyperporn and cybersex ranking as sensational news items on
>local TV stations, Fox's Los Angeles outlet has taken the trend a
>step further by ensnaring adult sexual predators. KTTV's Fox 11 News
>at 10 worked with a 21-year-old woman posing as a 14-year-old to
>conduct cybersting operations that led to the arrests of five men.
>KTTV used the unnamed woman as bait, having her enter online chat
>rooms where she was immediately targeted. The station filmed the
>online seductions as well as the arrests of the men, who included an
>attorney, a doctor, a retired Army officer and an investigator for
>the Dept. of Labor. See story at
>http://www.infobeat.com/stories/cgi/story.cgi?id=5777644-464
And then they tricked a real 14 year old girl into meeting with them and
having sex so that maybe, if they really, really tried very hard, they
could argue that a real crime had been committed, right?
Didn't think so.
NODE 143b4b49Re: [news] TV station sets cybersex sting
phelix@vallnet.comThu, 6 Nov 1997 12:52:42 +0800
On 5 Nov 1997 22:24:09 -0600, Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org> wrote:
>
>>*** TV station sets cybersex sting
>
>>With cyperporn and cybersex ranking as sensational news items on
>>local TV stations, Fox's Los Angeles outlet has taken the trend a
>>step further by ensnaring adult sexual predators. KTTV's Fox 11 News
>>at 10 worked with a 21-year-old woman posing as a 14-year-old to
>>conduct cybersting operations that led to the arrests of five men.
>>KTTV used the unnamed woman as bait, having her enter online chat
>>rooms where she was immediately targeted. The station filmed the
>>online seductions as well as the arrests of the men, who included an
>>attorney, a doctor, a retired Army officer and an investigator for
>>the Dept. of Labor. See story at
>>http://www.infobeat.com/stories/cgi/story.cgi?id=5777644-464
>
>And then they tricked a real 14 year old girl into meeting with them and
>having sex so that maybe, if they really, really tried very hard, they
>could argue that a real crime had been committed, right?
>
>Didn't think so.
And what will happen in court if these guys claim that they assumed that
the girl was really an older person pertending to be a 14 yr. old girl and
that they were just engaging in a little fantasy play? Or have
thoughtcrimes finally become a reality?
-- Phelix