NODE 89a97b3dRe: Y2K: Canada status?
nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)Wed, 12 Nov 1997 12:36:10 +0800
Jean-Francois Avon wrote:
> Please reply to my personnal address, I am not on CPunks.
>
> Is there anybody who knows about the Y2K situation in Canada?
>
> Should we infer that the situation will be the same here or were any preparation steps
> taken by out govt that will postpone our contry's alledged fall by 2 microseconds (time for
> any major economic catastrophy in the US to reach us here)
Canadians have the additional problem of having a lot of software which
is customized to convert differing MM/DD/YY formats back and forth. More
so than many other countries, because of the close working relationship
of many small to medium companies with American customers and vendors.
Many Canadian companies do not seem to realize that their software
works with their 'Joe America' software package only because the guy
who left the company six years ago did some obscure customization.
I have seen problems that appeared only when Canadian companies
updated their 'Joe America' software, and that was _without_ date-code
changes.
Many companies that run Canadian versions of software are also unaware
of the customizations made to it by vendors in order to 'make' it
work with US versions as it was advertised to do out of the box.
As well, even Canadian companies who are ready and willing to tackle
the Y2K problem are sometimes unable to do so until those who their
software needs to interact with do so. It is sometimes very difficult
for them to fix the 'Canadian' parts of the code without adjusting
the 'American' parts of the code, with no assurance that once their
American counterparts do their changes, all of their work/money goes
out the window.
During the decimal/metric changeover in Canada, I had more than one
car which required me to have tools for 'both' systems, to do even
the smallest of mechanical tasks on it.
Now might be a great time to invest in companies who resisted the
move to computerization, and who still have bookeepers and the
like on staff.
CanuckMonger
NODE b8e951efRe: Y2K: Canada status?
? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>Wed, 12 Nov 1997 15:29:16 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Anonymous wrote:
[...]
> Now might be a great time to invest in companies who resisted the
> move to computerization, and who still have bookeepers and the
> like on staff.
I think it is more the time to invest in companies who still have
bookmakers and the like on staff.
- --
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header.
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNGlDlaQK0ynCmdStAQFL6AP/WjVFIh2OCaTWT6XA3vaia2EmLfGbGMrD
yHKuUBE+sMbAm1Xg3CuvwNitO5r0k286OkSKINdfZkdP5M3J0MMxDjuaX96/UDzG
miHAV5nVwvkhxiw5mAly703Hd/5TYBKh4UVgFHRdosAfr92v6FgRPzJf+HXBBEe5
OzLfCeHVc7I=
=2zSq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----