NODE c0f44e50Senate Commerce cmte approves tax freedom bill 14-5
Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>Wed, 5 Nov 1997 03:22:17 +0800
[Right now I'm over at the Digital/Altavista summit to discuss rating
systems in search engines so I missed the vote. (Barry Steinhardt from the
ACLU just finished speaking. Sen. Judd Gregg, a CDA fan, spoke this
morning.) This bill limits local and state governments' ability to tax the
Net. --Declan]
----
(forwarded to me by a House staffer)
>The full Senate Commerce Committee voted today 14-5 to approve an amended
>version of the Internet Tax Freedom Act. Here's how members voted:
>
>14 Yes: McCain, Stevens, Burns, Snowe, Ashcroft, Frist, Abraham, Brownback,
>Hollings, Inouye, Rockefeller, Kerry, Breaux, Wyden
>5 No: Gorton, Hutchinson, Ford, Bryan, Dorgan
>1 Did not vote: Lott
NODE 9d939e58Re: Senate Commerce cmte approves tax freedom bill 14-5
Jim Burnes <jvb@n-o-s-p-a-m.ssds.com>Wed, 5 Nov 1997 04:26:31 +0800
On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> >The full Senate Commerce Committee voted today 14-5 to approve an amended
> >version of the Internet Tax Freedom Act. Here's how members voted:
> >
> >14 Yes: McCain, Stevens, Burns, Snowe, Ashcroft, Frist, Abraham, Brownback,
> >Hollings, Inouye, Rockefeller, Kerry, Breaux, Wyden
> >5 No: Gorton, Hutchinson, Ford, Bryan, Dorgan
> >1 Did not vote: Lott
>
Hmmmm. With a yes vote from the above mentioned parties I wonder
what the possible implications are. Specifically McCain, Inouye and
Rockefeller.
Ashcroft has been pro internet for years so I'm not concerned.
Is there anything in the ITFA that assigns specific powers that
didn't exist before? Like a Federal Tax on Internet Access?
Interesting.
jim
-----
Jim Burnes
Security Software Engineer, SSDS Inc.
Denver, CO
Remove the n-o-s-p-a-m. from my email to respond
-----