NODE d980e743Re: Invasive interface
Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>Wed, 19 Nov 1997 05:55:41 +0800
--- begin forwarded text
From: Eric Paulos <paulos@cs.berkeley.edu>
To: wearables List <wearables@media.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Invasive interface
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 15:28:02 -0800
On a somewhat related issue Eduardo Kac from the Chicago Art Institute
last week sucessfully implanted a microchip under his skin. This is
much more of a "dumb" chip as it simply can report back an ID number
when queried and doesn't really have any sensing or processing.
However, it is notable because it was done by a non-medical individual
on his own accord and at least shows that implants are becoming a more
accessable to the common person. Now only what to do about that
heatsink... More info here:
http://www.dialdata.com.br/casadasrosas/net-art/kac/
-Eric Paulos
AO> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 14:49:57 -0500 (EST) From: Lee Campbell
AO> <elwin@media.mit.edu> Subject: Re: beyond wearable
>> My wife's uncle just got a pacemaker. It's a new design; it
>> listens to his heart, runs signal processing algorithms, and
>> decides if his occasional arrhythmia is present; if so it takes
>> over control of his heart muscles; the rest of the time it sits
>> idle and lets his heart be controlled naturally.
.... TRUNCATED MESSAGE
--- end forwarded text
-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/
Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http://www.fc98.ai/>
NODE f87b7957Re: Invasive interface
stewarts@ix.netcom.comThu, 20 Nov 1997 11:27:45 +0800
At 01:42 PM 11/18/1997 -0500, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>On a somewhat related issue Eduardo Kac from the Chicago Art Institute
>last week sucessfully implanted a microchip under his skin. This is
>much more of a "dumb" chip as it simply can report back an ID number
>when queried and doesn't really have any sensing or processing.
>However, it is notable because it was done by a non-medical individual
>on his own accord and at least shows that implants are becoming a more
>accessable to the common person.
It's not tough - you can get implants for your cat or dog for ~$25.
They're installed by a vet, but it's a simple subcutaneous injection,
so all they need to do is disinfect the site, pinch some skin,
and inject it carefully, (and try to keep from getting bitten.)
No different for injecting in into a human, except the government
wants you to have their permission to practice medicine,
and you may not need to worry about getting bitten.
Thanks!
Bill
Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Regular Key PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639