NODE bc364557Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom (fwd)
Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>Tue, 9 Dec 1997 10:00:02 +0800
Forwarded message:
> Date: 8 Dec 1997 17:40:04 -0000
> From: Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>
> Subject: Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom
> I find it interesting that most of the people who refer to anonymous
> posters as "hiding behind" or "hiding behind the skirts of" something
> usually have unlisted telephone numbers when you try to do a search
> for them. <g> I wonder why "hiding behind" an unlisted telephone number
> is considered acceptable but having an "unlisted" e-mail address is not
> considered acceptable?
> BTW, do you "hide behind" clothes when you walk on the street? If so, why?
> Got something to hide? Huh? COWARD!!!! <g>
Public anonymity and having an unlisted phone number are not even the same
thing. An unlisted phone number is to reduce public exposure, anonymity is
to enhance public exposure and secure plausible deniability. To have an
analogous situation you would need to use a *listed* phone number registered
to anonymous in such a way that ANI displayed the number but any directory
search resulted in anonymous w/ no address or other tracing info even for
the phone company. To the best of my knowledge no phone company anywhere
will allow a customer to purchase service without identifying themselves to
the phone company. Please let me know if there is such a beast somewhere.
Generaly people wear clothes because it is convenient and required by social
mores and legal statute.
Put your money where you mouth is, send your bank acct. no. & PIN to the
list....come on, you can trust US.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| |
| We built your fort. We will not have it used against us. |
| |
| John Wayne - Allegheny Uprising |
| |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
NODE 405bc5d2Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom (fwd)
Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>Thu, 11 Dec 1997 06:23:25 +0800
At 3:43 PM +0000 12/9/1997, jonathon wrote:
>On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Jim Choate wrote:
>
>> analogous situation you would need to use a *listed* phone number registered
>> to anonymous in such a way that ANI displayed the number but any directory
>> search resulted in anonymous w/ no address or other tracing info even for
>> the phone company. To the best of my knowledge no phone company anywhere
Third party, anonymous, telephone services are available. One in Las Vegas (at least it used to be) is Private Lines, which is an anonyous re-dialer using 900 number billing for payment.
--Steve
NODE 20be7b94Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom (fwd)
Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>Tue, 9 Dec 1997 21:26:48 +0800
Jim Choate writes:
> To the best of my knowledge no phone company anywhere
> will allow a customer to purchase service without identifying themselves to
> the phone company. Please let me know if there is such a beast somewhere.
Go to your nearest convenience store. It's got something called a
pay phone. Just cough up a quarter, no ID required.
NODE c23f544aRe: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom (fwd)
Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>Wed, 10 Dec 1997 00:12:58 +0800
With both Nynex and Bell Atlantic, I've gotten phone service under a
nym. No SSN, no credit references, no problem.
Just don't call yourself Bill Clinton.
Fred
Jeff Barber wrote:
| Jim Choate writes:
|
| > To the best of my knowledge no phone company anywhere
| > will allow a customer to purchase service without identifying themselves to
| > the phone company. Please let me know if there is such a beast somewhere.
|
| Go to your nearest convenience store. It's got something called a
| pay phone. Just cough up a quarter, no ID required.
|
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume
NODE 83239ceeRe: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom (fwd)
jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>Tue, 9 Dec 1997 23:47:28 +0800
On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Jim Choate wrote:
> analogous situation you would need to use a *listed* phone number registered
> to anonymous in such a way that ANI displayed the number but any directory
> search resulted in anonymous w/ no address or other tracing info even for
> the phone company. To the best of my knowledge no phone company anywhere
Usually known as "Secure Phone Service." << Which is also the
name of one or two other services that local telco's offer. >>
Where the phone company has an address to send the bill to, but
has no idea where the phone is physically located.
Most of the secure phones I'm aware of have unlisted numbers.
But that isn't a requirement.
The specific name of this service does change according to who
is providing the phone service. My guess is that less than 1%
of the sales reps at the telco that has installed the most of
them, has no idea what that service involves --- and will deny
that such a service is even offered by them.