NODE 6fc6e7dcRe: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 03:40:00 +0800
Lizard writes:
> At 12:55 PM 12/23/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote:
>> Freedom of expression is not the same as freedom of oppression.
> How is someone 'oppressed' by my choosing not to deal with him for some
> reasons, but not for other reasons? Either way, he does not get my services.
> I refuse to hire you because you are black -- you are oppressed.
> I refuse to hire you because you're an Aquarius and my astrologer told me
> not to hire Aquarians -- you are not oppressed.
> I refuse to hire you because you're a Republican and I'm a Democrat, and I
> don't think we'll work well together -- you are not oppressed.
> But in all cases, you are not hired.
> Explain the logic of this to me.
The logic is about patterns of discrimination of society and the State
acting as a social engineer to remove the patterns.
It is about basic human decency, and giving a person a fighting chance.
If society, in general, discriminated against people with freckles, it
is likely that it would be made illegal.
> (Yes, it is perfectly legal to not hire someone based on star sign,
> political affiliation, or having freckles.)
> No human being has a right to compel service from another human being.
No majority group has a right to discriminate against a minority.
You prove that you know The Truth, and I'll prove that I know The Truth.
> If I
> do not wish to engage in trade with you, that's my right. Would you be less
> oppressed if I just closed up shop and refused to trade with ANYONE?
Oppression is done by a society. It can only be stopped by acting
against the individuals in the society that are doing the oppressing.
> The issue here is not expression, but association.
That's a good point. However, the alternate doesn't have the same
rhythm:
Freedom of association is not the same as freedom of oppression.
--
Colin
NODE 238005d4Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>Fri, 2 Jan 1998 05:16:49 +0800
> It is about basic human decency, and giving a person a fighting chance.
No, acts of law which require employers not to discriminate against
niggers, wops, kikes or greezers, or any other ratial group infringe
basic rights of association, I personally have no racist prejudices, but
recognise the freedom of others to be as bigotted as they care to be.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
NODE 942fb804Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
Jon Galt <jongalt@everest.pinn.net>Sun, 11 Jan 1998 02:40:57 +0800
On 23 Dec 1997, Colin Rafferty wrote:
> Oppression is done by a society. It can only be stopped by acting
> against the individuals in the society that are doing the oppressing.
Well make up your mind! Is it done "by a society" or by "individuals"???
______________________________________________________________________
Jon Galt
e-mail: jongalt@pinn.net
website: http://www.pinn.net/~jongalt/
PGP public key available on my website.
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
______________________________________________________________________
NODE 0410f2c6Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
sameer <sameer@c2.net>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 03:54:23 +0800
I don't read fight censorship so I can see people flame each
other about freedom of association. Thank you.
--
Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770
President FAX: 510-986-8777
C2Net
http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net
NODE e081d10cRe: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 04:01:28 +0800
sameer writes:
> I don't read fight censorship so I can see people flame each
> other about freedom of association. Thank you.
I am sorry. Somebody who should know better cross-posts incendiary
messages to both fight-censorship and cypherpunks.
I just can't stand reading obviously idiotic messages without
responding. I will try to refrain.
By the way, I am not subscribed to cypherpunks, soif you have something
to say, CC me.
--
Colin
NODE 87576c19Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)Wed, 24 Dec 1997 05:04:21 +0800
sameer <sameer@c2.net> writes:
> I don't read fight censorship so I can see people flame each
> other about freedom of association. Thank you.
Hey Sameer,
Is it true what people have been saying about you and the camel on
the cypherpunks list?
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
NODE 60f3a9ffRe: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 07:16:38 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <ocru3bz3lrh.fsf@ml.com>, on 12/23/97
at 02:25 PM, Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com> said:
>The logic is about patterns of discrimination of society and the State
>acting as a social engineer to remove the patterns.
This is the crux of the matter (and for Seamer the relevance to FC). It is
*NOT* the job of the STATE to play social engineer. There is no
Constitutional mandate for it and in numerous clauses and Amendments it is
strictly prohibited from doing so.
It is this concept that the STATE can disregard the Constitution whenever
it feels like it is the reason why we have ITAR/EAR, CDA,
Volentary/Mandatory Ratting systems, ECC, FCC ...etc.
When you support the blatant violation of the Constitution by the
government because their actions fit your political/social agenda you
loose all credibility when you go to oppose them on a separate violation.
This is why the so-called civil rights groups have very low credibility
with many.
Either we have a government which must obey the laws of the land (with the
Constitution being the supreme law) or we have the current system where
the law is disregarded whenever it is politically expedient.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNKBC9I9Co1n+aLhhAQJyeAP/SCHQyP8gkuV5ogM5xydukD8pyvwvRXWE
3hYej5sxR1aaiq8iuqEFtFTfJrnyHDU5nxWwcBMUDXqh6BYQs2RSrSEUS3SMxHcA
IMbohL0TYkTEV5EltMFoaJ67243SVg3cX5Wp/XHIy92L6vUEPRataH1fxw4R0gyA
BTdUa6IlCzQ=
=8d92
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----