Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment

At 08:18 PM 1/1/98 +0000, Paul Bradley wrote:

>> It is about basic human decency, and giving a person a fighting chance.

>No, acts of law which require employers not to discriminate against 
>niggers, wops, kikes or greezers, or any other ratial group infringe 
>basic rights of association, I personally have no racist prejudices, but 
>recognise the freedom of others to be as bigotted as they care to be.

        Does that include the krauts, micks, limeys, frogs as well as the
canucks and pea soup eaters? The polacks, chinks and dagos? The Wogs too? 

        Can't we all be ethnic slurs together? 

        Which reminds me. We never did get a good one for the Russians. Any
nominations? 


-=-=-

Censorship is OK if it is of them. 
	-- the F-C motto

> >No, acts of law which require employers not to discriminate against 
> >niggers, wops, kikes or greezers, or any other ratial group infringe 
> >basic rights of association, I personally have no racist prejudices, but 
> >recognise the freedom of others to be as bigotted as they care to be.
> 
>         Does that include the krauts, micks, limeys, frogs as well as the
> canucks and pea soup eaters? The polacks, chinks and dagos? The Wogs too? 

Indeed it does.

>         Which reminds me. We never did get a good one for the Russians. Any
> nominations? 

Reds is always a good one, and especially ignorant and offensive since 
the communist tyranny was replaced with a "democratic" one. Can`t think 
of any others offhand.

        Datacomms Technologies data security
       Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
  Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"