Re: rec.guns et.al. blocked by censorware

At 3:02 PM -0800 2/8/98, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
>In rec.guns, Dan <ywq@wco.com> wrote:
>* I guess I should not be surprised but blocking software Cyber Patrol
>apparently
>* blocks rec.guns and rec.hunting because we are militant extremists, advocate
>* violence and swear.   The whole story starts at:
>* http://www.spectacle.org/cwp/index.html
>* You have to keep going until you get to newsgroups.

>Examples of HUNDREDS of blocked newsgroups:
>
>rec.games.mecha Giant robot games. (Moderated) Quest/Illegal/Gamble
>Violence/Profanity Intol
>news.groups             Discussions and lists of newsgroups. Intol
>news.groups.questions   Where can I find talk about topic X? Intol
>rec.guns Discussions about firearms. (Moderated) Militant/Extreme
>Violence/Profanity


Interestingly, rec.guns is moderated (not that I like that), and there is
virtually no profanity or discussion of anything remotely of a sexual
nature. The discussion is on-topic, about revolvers, rifles, ammunition,
target shooting, defense methods, etc.

That the "cyber nannies" are blocking it (and other similarly nonsexual,
nonprofane newsgroups) is exactly what was expected. These cyber nannies
become tools for political correctness.

Perhaps the strategy should be to post material to other newsgroups to get
them blocked as well. (Though I expect the blocking is not being done using
robots to monitor for illegal words, as rec.guns would not have been
blocked this way. Rather, the cyber nannies are probably using their "PC
judgment" to block groups they don't like.

--Tim May

Just Say No to "Big Brother Inside"
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^3,021,377   | black markets, collapse of governments.

Tim May <tcmay@got.net> writes:
> That the "cyber nannies" are blocking [rec.guns] (and other similarly nonsexual,
> nonprofane newsgroups) is exactly what was expected. These cyber nannies
> become tools for political correctness.

Steve Boursy reports that another censorware vendor has been caught mailbombing
a critic (sent her >400 junk e-mails) in retaliation for her criticism.

Guy Polis is a pedophile.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps