NODE 65e3aaf7Holy QPRNF...
Xcott Craver <caj@math.niu.edu>Mon, 4 May 1998 17:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/980504/ca_live_pi_1.html
Summary: Digimarc and Live Picture, Inc., team up to offer watermarking
services.
|| ``Until very recently, the creative community was extremely skeptical of
|| licensing and marketing their work over the Web, which they viewed as an
|| absolute free-for-all,'' said Doug Dawirs, director of online services at
|| The Workbook. ``Now these same people and companies are jumping in with
|| both feet.''
I hope no content creators mistakenly think that this is electronic
content protection (possibly, one can say an aid to detect _unintentional_
illicit use, but not intentional theft), or else there will be a
free-for-all of a legal kind a little further down the road.
I also wonder about the proposed batch processing option, embedding
the same watermark into multiple images. I can see a number of
security problems here, especially if Live Picture can not (likely)
keep track of all the images marked by them.
=Xcott
NODE 9e771ce6Re: Holy QPRNF...
"snow" <snow@smoke.suba.com>Thu, 28 May 1998 21:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
> http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/980504/ca_live_pi_1.html
> Summary: Digimarc and Live Picture, Inc., team up to offer watermarking
> services.
> || ``Until very recently, the creative community was extremely skeptical of
> || licensing and marketing their work over the Web, which they viewed as an
> || absolute free-for-all,'' said Doug Dawirs, director of online services at
> || The Workbook. ``Now these same people and companies are jumping in with
> || both feet.''
> I hope no content creators mistakenly think that this is electronic
> content protection (possibly, one can say an aid to detect _unintentional_
> illicit use, but not intentional theft), or else there will be a
> free-for-all of a legal kind a little further down the road.
I work for a company who displays much of their work on the
Web, and we are often sited by Digimarc as a "customer".
We (AFAICT) stoped bothering with their product (probably an older
version) simply because it didn't work.
I can take any image where the watermark IS NOT visible, and
make it so that your scanning software doesn't work, yet most people wouldn't
notice a bloody thing.
Suckerware.