NODE 3aa4bb62DoD orders vendors to use Key "Recovery"
"Trei, Peter" <ptrei@securitydynamics.com>Fri, 8 May 1998 12:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
I hope someone sends them the NSA report on the security hazards of
KR.
Peter Trei
ptrei@securitydynamics.com
---------------
http://www.gcn.com/gcn/1998/May4/cov1.htm
GCN May 4, 1998
Defense wants PKI now
Department intends to make vendors use strong encryption
By Christopher J. Dorobek
To jump-start development of a public-key recovery system, the Defense
Department plans to require its vendors to use strong encryption,
deputy Defense secretary John Hamre said recently.
Because it wields significant buying clout, Defense's more stringent
requirements should boost government and industry efforts to build
systems for managing encryption keys, Hamre said last month at an
Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association event in
Washington.
Agencies cannot wait for the government and industry to settle on a
national encryption policy, Hamre said.
Through successive administrations, the government has tried to
develop a singular policy on encryption. But so far, the efforts have
failed. Generally, industry has criticized the government's policy
proposals as too restrictive.
"We have an important national imperative to protect ourselves in this
world," Hamre said. "We can't wait to have this issue resolved ...
therefore we're going to buy encryption with key recovery."
Vendors will have to use encrypted data and be able to recover it when
doing business with DOD, he said.
Defense will work out a final policy in the coming weeks, Hamre said.
[...]
NODE da886032Re: DoD orders vendors to use Key "Recovery"
Alan Olsen <alan@clueserver.org>Fri, 8 May 1998 20:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
At 03:05 PM 5/8/98 -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
>
>
>I hope someone sends them the NSA report on the security hazards of
>KR.
I think that people should sell the Government crypto software with key
recovery. We need to have a backdoor into the government's communications.
Any key recovery system sold to the governemtn should have a real obvious
and visible key recovery system so they know that it is there.
>
>Peter Trei
>ptrei@securitydynamics.com
>
>---------------
>http://www.gcn.com/gcn/1998/May4/cov1.htm
>
>GCN May 4, 1998
>
>Defense wants PKI now
>Department intends to make vendors use strong encryption
>By Christopher J. Dorobek
>
>To jump-start development of a public-key recovery system, the Defense
>Department plans to require its vendors to use strong encryption,
>deputy Defense secretary John Hamre said recently.
>
>Because it wields significant buying clout, Defense's more stringent
>requirements should boost government and industry efforts to build
>systems for managing encryption keys, Hamre said last month at an
>Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association event in
>Washington.
>
>Agencies cannot wait for the government and industry to settle on a
>national encryption policy, Hamre said.
>
>Through successive administrations, the government has tried to
>develop a singular policy on encryption. But so far, the efforts have
>failed. Generally, industry has criticized the government's policy
>proposals as too restrictive.
>
>"We have an important national imperative to protect ourselves in this
>world," Hamre said. "We can't wait to have this issue resolved ...
>therefore we're going to buy encryption with key recovery."
>
>Vendors will have to use encrypted data and be able to recover it when
>doing business with DOD, he said.
>
>Defense will work out a final policy in the coming weeks, Hamre said.
>
>[...]
>
---
| "That'll make it hot for them!" - Guy Grand |
|"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer: |
| mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!" | Ignore the man |
|`finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key | behind the keyboard.|
| http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com/~alan/ |alan@ctrl-alt-del.com|