// COMPLETE THREAD

anonymous mailboxes

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 612924c2anonymous mailboxes
Some time ago I heard about Lucky Green's then-immature scheme for 
anonymous email boxes, whereby a user can receive email and even a 
traffic analysis attacker is unable to glean information about who 
received what when.  I forget exactly what ve called vis method...




   Is there a paper available anyplace?

   Has the scheme been validated mathematically?

   Has it been implemented?




    ::sprokkit::

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
NODE 46fda2e5Re: anonymous mailboxes
>On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Sprokkit Amhal wrote:
>> anonymous email boxes, whereby a user can receive email and even a 
>> traffic analysis attacker is unable to glean information about who 
>> received what when.  I forget exactly what ve called vis method...

One way to do pseudonymous email boxes is to use a web-based
mailbox server such as hotmail and pick up the mail through
anonymizers or onion routers.  Obviously you need SSL for the
anonymizer connections, and for the mailbox connection as well,
and the name of the mailbox needs to be in the encrypted portion
of the SSL requests rather than in the sniffable URL parts.
The main threat is eavesdroppers watching the anonymizers
over a period of time, picking up patterns that may not show
during a single mail pickup.  So you need enough anonymizers out there, 
or enough cover traffic on a smaller number of anonymizers, 
but it should basically be doable.

It also helps if you can send mail to the mailer using the web,
with SSL and chains of anonymizers to do it, to protect the sender,
but anonymous remailers can also solve that problem.
				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
NODE 765f85beRe: anonymous mailboxes
It was not my scheme. I simply gave a presentation at HIP of a system that
was designed by a person wishing to remain anonymous.

Much of the design has changed since. I am not at liberty to discuss
futher details. The original presentation in MS
PowerPoint format is still sitting at
http://www.cypherpunks.to/~shamrock/anonmail.ppt

I have no plans to update or convert this particular presentation.

On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Sprokkit Amhal wrote:

>    Some time ago I heard about Lucky Green's then-immature scheme for 
> anonymous email boxes, whereby a user can receive email and even a 
> traffic analysis attacker is unable to glean information about who 
> received what when.  I forget exactly what ve called vis method...
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    Is there a paper available anyplace?
> 
>    Has the scheme been validated mathematically?
> 
>    Has it been implemented?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     ::sprokkit::
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> 
> 


-- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP v5 encrypted email preferred.
   "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"