MItSchill Millhouse Holler'in

Mitch Halloran, unwitting schill of the TrilateralCPU, digitized:
 
> I neglected to take into consideration that this attempt at 
> revisionist history of the greatest President of the US in the 
> 20th Century, perhaps in US history...this raving and ranting 
> to take the name of FDR in vain...this dribble to take all of 
> humanity's name in vain...this project to develop the Mother 
> of All Conspiracy Theories, including figuring out a way to 
> show the Big Bang is/was, all of it, every last bit, a 
> conspiracy...
 
> ...well, it could be ciphertext for which I have not received 
> the key for making into plaintext.  Someone please forward the 
> key to me.
 
  Working in a Drug Lab, I would imagine that the key required
to make sense of SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!! is easily within
reach...check the 500 ml beaker to your immediate left...
 
  To tell the truth, most of my ranting and raving in regard
to the InfernalTruths EreuIndicted in SAHMD is done out of
kindness towards those who are the target of both my BarbLess
Wit and my WitLess Barbs, since merely revealing the NakedTruth
about many of these individuals might result in the Reader 
having an eye put out, although HeOrShe would still have one
good eye left to see that the person who was giving rise to 
the BluntNosed Sword of Truth was not the individual's wife.
 
  ReVisionIst, to me, indicates someone who takes another look
at what was previously seen with the aid of colour-glossy photos
and pie-charts provided by the people who threatened to imprison
your parents if they failed to send you to government-sponsered
IndoctrinationCamps justified under the ruse of FreeEducation,
which sometimes seem mostly geared for reinforcing in our minds
how lucky we are to live in a country where the government is
kind enough to provide us with FreeIncomeTaxReturnForms.
 
  Son of Mother Of All Chapters, as presented to the CypherPunks
list, quite simply provides a plethora of Official Versions of
the events surrounding the murder of one of Franklin Roosevelt's
political enemies, Anton Cermak.
  Those perusing the material may come to the conclusion that
if a wide variety of official news sources and official law
enforcement agencies don't seem to have a fucking clue as to
the time, date or sequence of events surrounding the murder,
the death of Cermak, the trial or the execution, then perhaps
one would be remiss in too hasty in accepting the same people's
conclusions that Roosevelt, and not Cermak, was the target, it
would be hard to fault their logic.
 
  As far as Roosevelt, or anyone else, being "the greatest
President" of any era, it would be more accurate to describe
their being the GreatestBullShitter of the era, or of having
the GreatestAdvertising/SpinDoctor/PoliticalThugs of the era.
 
  It is a matter of speculation to what extent Roosevelt's 
actions were responsible for the recovery of the American
economy after the collapse of the banking sector, but it is 
a matter of *fact*, supported by the testimony of even those
who were part of FDR's political entourage, that Roosevelt
took steps to ensure the *complete* collapse of America's
financial institutions while Hoover was still President,
in order to put himself in a position to extort as much
money and power as possible out of Congress. 
  Perhaps the massive suffering and financial losses that
he caused in his power-grab might be justified as being
'for the greater good,' except that, had he used his position
as President-elect to help restore confidence in the economy,
instead of destroying it, America would not have required
nearly as much 'saving' as it subsequently needed.
 
  It is a shame that I had not been born in an age when I
could have run for President against Roosevelt, and won.
  Had I done so, then I, like FDR, would have granted 
myself a license to print money, and I also would have
spent three times as much of the taxpayer's money as the
previous 31 Presidents, combined, but *I* would have spent
it all on beer and scotch, thus resurrecting the American
economy without creating a HugeGovernmentMonster filled
with political patronage appointees and employees who I
had bought and owned with imaginary money that taxpayers
would be responsible for repaying.
  Also, being drunk all of the time, there would have been
little chance of me turning America into a PlannedSociety
via a New Deal in which all of the cards being dealt were 
Red.
 
> By the way, I'm really one of you guys.  I am just working a 
> cover among the people who call themselves sane until you guys 
> who really know the truth can get into a position reveal these 
> eternal truths to the unbelievers.  he-he!
 
  We appreciate your efforts. Due to the limited space in
the HomeForTheCriminallyInsane, it is important for us to
have half-witting schills secretly infiltrating organizations
which are too ignorant of Truth&Reality (TM) to realize that
the NewCrayolaColours are part of the WorldWide Plot, even
when spelled without the 'u.'
 
~
ICould'aBeenAContend'aMonger
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Someone having looked over the shoulder of one Linda Reed--PCC West Campus 
CSC, getting her password, and then using her mail account, drooled with 
paralytic tongue as follos:

>   ReVisionIst, to me, indicates someone who takes another look
> at what was previously seen with the aid of colour-glossy photos
> and pie-charts provided by the people who threatened to imprison
> your parents if they failed to send you to government-sponsered
> IndoctrinationCamps justified under the ruse of FreeEducation,
> which sometimes seem mostly geared for reinforcing in our minds
> how lucky we are to live in a country where the government is
> kind enough to provide us with FreeIncomeTaxReturnForms.

What color are your glossy glasses, by the way?

In addition to "FreeIncomeTaxReturnForms", they also let me urinate in the 
national forests too.

>  
>   As far as Roosevelt, or anyone else, being "the greatest
> President" of any era, it would be more accurate to describe
> their being the GreatestBullShitter of the era, or of having
> the GreatestAdvertising/SpinDoctor/PoliticalThugs of the era.

Doesn't that count for something?  Be all you can be, right?  Excellence 
in being immoral is certainly better than being mediocre at being immoral.

>   It is a matter of speculation to what extent Roosevelt's 
> actions were responsible for the recovery of the American
> economy after the collapse of the banking sector, but it is 
> a matter of *fact*, supported by the testimony of even those
> who were part of FDR's political entourage, that Roosevelt
> took steps to ensure the *complete* collapse of America's
> financial institutions while Hoover was still President,
> in order to put himself in a position to extort as much
> money and power as possible out of Congress. 

Is this sort of like Reagan arranging with the Iranians that the Tehran 52 
could come home for Christmas, but not before?

And while having mentioned the cheese head, could you possibly do a piece 
on Reagan, by the way?  Now *that* is something I could enjoy reading.  
And really let loose with the prose, if you please:  the more insane, the 
more tangential, the better.

>   Perhaps the massive suffering and financial losses that
> he caused in his power-grab might be justified as being
> 'for the greater good,' except that, had he used his position
> as President-elect to help restore confidence in the economy,
> instead of destroying it, America would not have required
> nearly as much 'saving' as it subsequently needed.

Well, the implementation never really does live up to the grand design 
now, does it?  Ask any computer programmer here on this list.

>   It is a shame that I had not been born in an age when I
> could have run for President against Roosevelt, and won.

It is a shame that we'll all just have to endure.

>   Had I done so, then I, like FDR, would have granted 
> myself a license to print money, and I also would have
> spent three times as much of the taxpayer's money as the
> previous 31 Presidents, combined, but *I* would have spent
> it all on beer and scotch, thus resurrecting the American
> economy without creating a HugeGovernmentMonster filled
> with political patronage appointees and employees who I
> had bought and owned with imaginary money that taxpayers
> would be responsible for repaying.

Maybe you're not so crazy after all.  You know, it's not too late to enter 
the race for 2000.  It's a good year to start on, and because of your 
intimate connections with people who are information technology-aware, you 
could make some programmers fabulously wealthy by scamming people on the 
Y2K problem.

>   Also, being drunk all of the time, there would have been
> little chance of me turning America into a PlannedSociety
> via a New Deal in which all of the cards being dealt were 
> Red.

US Grant was also a lush.  How prosperous were those times when he could 
pick himself off the floor?

> ICould'aBeenAContend'aMonger
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I really am enjoying this.  I had apparently a great deal of spare time in 
the dog days of summer to humor the paranoids of the list although I was 
rather dreading the consequences.

*** Object Lesson:  NEVER ARGUE WITH AN INSANE INDIVIDUAL ***

1. You can never come to a compromise or even win:  it requires that the 
two sides be possessed of reason, and you have only half of what you need.

2. There is a risk that you just might start believing what that 
individual believes, especially when you start conceding small points that 
appear to be the truth.  (Don't be fooled.)

3. It reduces you to a less dignified state before your peers.  And 
appearance is everything.  Remember:  Style, not substance.  Form, not 
structure.


Mitch Halloran
Research (Bio)chemist
Duzen Laboratories Group
Ankara   TURKEY
mitch@duzen.com.tr

While in substance it is generally all the same, it still amazes
the observer that one will find that smelling one's own is somehow less
disgusting than smelling someone else's.   --Anonymous

On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, S. M. Halloran wrote:

    [smoke the balderdash]
>
>I really am enjoying this.  I had apparently a great deal of spare time in 
>the dog days of summer to humor the paranoids of the list although I was 
>rather dreading the consequences.
>
    	are you paranoid?  "dread" is a contributing factor to paranoia.

	dog days of summer --are you nuts? or just referring to Toto again?

>*** Object Lesson:  NEVER ARGUE WITH AN INSANE INDIVIDUAL ***
>
	yes, I see you are arguing with yourself. how do you look in
	the mirror?  have you found the Mad Hatter and the gerrymanderer?
	if the gerrymanderer cuts your "table" in two, which half will
	you be?

	you did not learn the most important lesson of the series: you
	must resort to the state of "crazy" to avoid going "insane".
	they give the insane Haldol if they are lucky, a lobotomy if
	that doesnt settle them down --witness Ken Kesey's "Cuckoo".

>1. You can never come to a compromise or even win:  it requires that the 
>two sides be possessed of reason, and you have only half of what you need.
>
	you got that one right! why dont you have _any_ reason for your
	intransigence?

	is it true you're several cards short of a full deck? and, there
	was some question as to your response to: "...and you said the
	last time you beat your wife was last Saturday?"

>2. There is a risk that you just might start believing what that 
>individual believes, especially when you start conceding small points that 
>appear to be the truth.  (Don't be fooled.)
>
	are you trying to imply that small lies are the foundation
	blocks of great truths?

	cowardly.  see Dorothy for counseling.

	great truths are built on small truths and fallacies are destroyed
 	with small lies that the little boy in Holland did not cover with
	his finger.

>3. It reduces you to a less dignified state before your peers.  And 
>appearance is everything.  Remember:  Style, not substance.  Form, not 
>structure.
>
	aaahh, I see you are the emporer with your new clothes!

>
>While in substance it is generally all the same, it still amazes
>the observer that one will find that smelling one's own is somehow less
>disgusting than smelling someone else's.   --Anonymous
>
    a disgusting comment which fits a research (bio)chemist in Turkey
    where birth control reminds me of:

   	the father of the bride, who was marrying a Turk, told her that
	she was not required to submit to the Turkish indecencies, and
	if her about to be husband told her to "roll over", she should
	refuse.

	everything was fine for about a year until one night the husband
	told her to "roll over" --she refused; and when questioned, she
	told him what her father had said. his reply was quite simple:
	"but you do wish to become pregnant, dont you?"

__________________________________________________________________________

    To be a ruler of men, you need at least 12 inches....

_________________________________________________________________ attila__

see: http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/0,2326,201980727-14191,00.html

Paul may be a kook to some, but he has the courage to stand against 
the forces who wish to take all our liberties --or should I say, those
few we have been permitted to keep.

Is it only a coincidence that the Social Security Admistration published 
the new requirements for the national ID in Section 666 of the code?

   "...and I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat 
on him was Death, and Hell followed with him." [RV 6-8]

   "and he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond,
to receive a markin  their right hand, or in their foreheads; [Rv13-16]
   "and that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the 
name of the beast, or the number of his name; [Rv13-17]
   "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of 
the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six Hundred 
threescore and six" [Rv13-18]

    OK, Mitch, it says it all in Revelation --and it is happening. See
    the article on defending yourself from Federal conspiracy charges
    which was posted to the list a few minutes ago by anonymous.

    I always define conspiracy as three guys getting drunk at a bar
    while discussing the idea of robbing the bank across the street.
    one passes out and the other two go across the street and attempt
    to rob the bank; all three are tried and convicted: two for robbing
    the bank; and three for conspiracy to rob the bank.

    so, be careful who you associate with; in Turkey you just might get
    rolled over....

	attila out...   one more time.