NODE 469f37ddRe: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism (fwd)
Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>Wed, 9 Sep 1998 07:44:41 +0800
Forwarded message:
> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 18:17:45 -0500
> From: Petro <petro@playboy.com>
> Subject: Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism
> planet and take all that fucking oil with them.
I wonder how the new realization that the calthrate deposits in the ocean
bottem off the continental shelf make fine fuel and it's replenishable and
may be of a larger quantity than the oil reserves will effect the power
balance.
____________________________________________________________________
The seeker is a finder.
Ancient Persian Proverb
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
NODE 5ee859ddoil, Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism (fwd)
Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>Thu, 10 Sep 1998 11:38:31 +0800
Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> > oil, the arabs will slip back into obscurity.
>
Can't wait.
> Good point! Ever wonder why a decreasing commodity non-
> renewable resource is becoming cheaper as the known reserves
> become smaller?
>
> Maybe they want to sell it all before it becomes obsolete and
> maximize their income from that resource.
>
> Within the oil business I have heard this mentioned in regards to
> natural gas.
>
I remember going to hear a Cornell geophysicist speak on this subject
about 17 years ago. The gist of his talk was that the porosity of the
mantle material had some unexpected variation vs. depth. This, along
with the nature of the natural gas fields in Louisiana and the content
profile of some oil reserves indicated a large amount of natural gas
reserves as part of the deeper structure. I don't know where this ever
went but it was pretty interesting at the time.
Mike
NODE 7a21b77cRe: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism (fwd)
"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>Wed, 9 Sep 1998 12:19:40 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <199809082359.SAA12044@einstein.ssz.com>, on 09/08/98
at 06:59 PM, Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com> said:
>Forwarded message:
>> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 18:17:45 -0500
>> From: Petro <petro@playboy.com>
>> Subject: Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism
>> planet and take all that fucking oil with them.
>I wonder how the new realization that the calthrate deposits in the ocean
>bottem off the continental shelf make fine fuel and it's replenishable
>and may be of a larger quantity than the oil reserves will effect the
>power balance.
Once an alternative fuel source is discovered that is more economical than
oil, the arabs will slip back into obscurity.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: Bugs come in through open Windows.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNfYC6o9Co1n+aLhhAQF0NAQAn5iFtYL/mDu1PQYyZkQfWsczExcnZGGm
dO9f99+vs9ZJG8GdnqIjcCWUvbettt3BX9GkaHJloIS1x16l8vrPwB9CuIIRv7RM
6/R3BEkRtEck0HSMYQmb9H+1UvGZWJzM0mYVVILURhEtXd0bbz62CHOj49D1qBK5
LW5yRENnvV8=
=c4/s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 3aded994Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism (fwd)
Petro <petro@playboy.com>Wed, 9 Sep 1998 18:06:55 +0800
At 5:09 PM -0500 9/9/98, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>William H. Geiger IIIwrote
>
>> Once an alternative fuel source is discovered that is more economical than
>> oil, the arabs will slip back into obscurity.
>
>Good point! Ever wonder why a decreasing commodity non-
>renewable resource is becoming cheaper as the known reserves
>become smaller?
Could it be that certain large players (say, the U.K, U.S. Soviet
Union &etc) have a vested interest in cheap oil as long as possible, so
they do things (like create the state of israel, and give it lots of
economic aid) to destablize the region, keep the people of that area at
each others throats &etc. so that OPEC can't agree to control prices...
Nah, I'm just paranoid.
petro@playboy.com----for work related issues. I don't speak for Playboy.
petro@bounty.org-----for everthing else. They wouldn't like that.
They REALLY
Economic speech IS political speech. wouldn't like that.
NODE 63258948Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism (fwd)
"Raymond D. Mereniuk" <Raymond@fbn.bc.ca>Wed, 9 Sep 1998 16:08:48 +0800
William H. Geiger IIIwrote
> Once an alternative fuel source is discovered that is more economical than
> oil, the arabs will slip back into obscurity.
Good point! Ever wonder why a decreasing commodity non-
renewable resource is becoming cheaper as the known reserves
become smaller?
Maybe they want to sell it all before it becomes obsolete and
maximize their income from that resource.
Within the oil business I have heard this mentioned in regards to
natural gas.
Virtually
Raymond D. Mereniuk
Raymond@fbn.bc.ca
NODE 0e392e54Re: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks.
Dave Brown <dbrown@alaska.net>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 01:28:25 +0800
Ray Arachelian typethed the following...
>
>Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
<snip>
>
>What pisses me off is that in NYC the gas prices are ridiculous high...
>$1.35/Gal is the regular gas, drive just a few miles over a tunnel or bridge
>to n NJ, it's $1.00 or $.99 depending on which pump you hit... go a bit
south,
>say VA, and in some areas it drops as low as $0.87 a gallon!
>
>Shit, if it weren't for the tolls and the drive, I'd be getting my gas out of
>NYC all the time, but doing so wastes enough and costs enough in tolls to not
>make it worth the effort...
>
>Just out of curiosity what are prices around where you guys live?
Prices in Anchorage are about $1.15 in the summer and $1.30-5 when the
tourists leave. And we have all the oil you can use and a bunch of
refinery's up here.
We get shafted nearly as bad as you do.
--Dave
Lucidity Paradox: Explain a concept in sufficient detail, and it will
become clearer and clearer until it eventually disappears.
NODE 43667a34Re: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks.
Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>Sat, 12 Sep 1998 07:19:43 +0800
At 02:38 PM 9/11/98 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
>Those New Jersey prices, while lower than New York, are still
>articifially high, since they're "full-service". The People's
>Republic of New Jersey *knows* that regular untrained citizens
>can't be trusted to pump their own gasoline reliably -
>otherwise you'd be having frequent explosions at gasoline
>stations like you do in the rest of the country.
No. The legislature knows that the citizens of the Garden State are otherwise unemployable so they have established a protected job category of gas jockey to keep them off the streets.
DCF
NODE 10962f77Re: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks.
Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:44:47 +0800
Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> Now we have cheap oil. Big powerful vehicles are back and we are
> not embarrassed to consume energy any more. I have no idea
> where society is heading but I do like have a more powerful vehicle
> which capable of passing a vehicle already doing 65 MPH.
What pisses me off is that in NYC the gas prices are ridiculous high...
$1.35/Gal is the regular gas, drive just a few miles over a tunnel or bridge
to n NJ, it's $1.00 or $.99 depending on which pump you hit... go a bit south,
say VA, and in some areas it drops as low as $0.87 a gallon!
Shit, if it weren't for the tolls and the drive, I'd be getting my gas out of
NYC all the time, but doing so wastes enough and costs enough in tolls to not
make it worth the effort...
Just out of curiosity what are prices around where you guys live?
> The whole Greens or tree-hugger thing is a bit hypocritical. Ask
> them if they have electrical appliances in their home and the answer
> is always yes. For a number of years the Greenpeace fundraisers
> would show up at the door asking for money to battle the forest
> industry and the evil pulp mills which used chlorine in their bleaching
> process and they would have white paper in their clipboards.
Yep... saw one at Barnes & Noble a while ago bitching about how he got a
plastic bag. We'll, if he's worried that plastic is bad for the environment,
he should worry about the murdered tree in his hand that he just purchased...
Ditto for militant vegans... it's one thing to do it for health reasons, it's
another to be an asshole about killing fuzzy animals.. hey veggies are alive
too. If you're gonna murder veggies to live, (whose growth results in the
death of millions of insects who would devour the veggies if not for
insecticides) you may as well quit being a hypocrite and murder animals too...
The only way for a consciencious objecting vegan to not be a hypocrite is to
simply stop eating and drinking and breathing... after all, every time he does
so, he inhales, ingests, or otherwise murders billions of microbes... :)
(Whenever someone asks if I have special dietary needs, I say "I'm a carnivore,
make sure you've got plenty of red meat!") :)
By far the worst is the recycling law in NYC. If you don't recycle your trash,
you get fined. If a homeless bum sticks his hand in a recycling bin and grabs
a paper he gets arrested for theft of government property, etc... If someone
throws a can of soda in your trash bins infront of your house, you pay a $50
fine... A while back some may remeber the "Toilet Escrow" thread... yep that
too has hit New York. Every toilet in our apt building was exchanged for one
that supposedly saves water... Whatever the political and economic kickbacks
were, it now takes an average of three flushes to sink a bowlful of turds...
My math says that's a lot more wasted water than the single flush of the old
toilet.
--
=====================================Kaos=Keraunos=Kybernetos==============
.+.^.+.| Ray Arachelian |Prying open my 3rd eye. So good to see |./|\.
..\|/..|sunder@sundernet.com|you once again. I thought you were |/\|/\
<--*-->| ------------------ |hiding, and you thought that I had run |\/|\/
../|\..| "A toast to Odin, |away chasing the tail of dogma. I opened|.\|/.
.+.v.+.|God of screwdrivers"|my eye and there we were.... |.....
======================= http://www.sundernet.com ==========================
NODE f0122005Re: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks.
Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 23:53:23 +0800
Some whining Yankee wrote:
>>What pisses me off is that in NYC the gas prices are ridiculous high...
>>$1.35/Gal is the regular gas, drive just a few miles over a tunnel or bridge
>>to n NJ, it's $1.00 or $.99 depending on which pump you hit... go a bit
>south,
>>say VA, and in some areas it drops as low as $0.87 a gallon!
Over in Europe, prices are mostly about $1 -- per liter.
Back here in California, prices have been varying a lot, and
are generally higher in areas with lots of people, lots of money,
or lots of restrictions on gas stations. Here in San Francisco,
it's about $1.30, and down in Silicon Valley it's mostly about
$1.20, with some cheaper stations and some more expensive.
We have different gas - for environmental reasons, they add
chemicals designed to pollute water and irritate people's lungs
(while reducing smog a bit.)
Those New Jersey prices, while lower than New York, are still
articifially high, since they're "full-service". The People's
Republic of New Jersey *knows* that regular untrained citizens
can't be trusted to pump their own gasoline reliably -
otherwise you'd be having frequent explosions at gasoline
stations like you do in the rest of the country.
Any time the legislature begins to suggest legalizing
self-service gas, small gas station owners pretending to be
little old ladies write to all the newspapers protesting that
they'd have to pay a lot more money to have gas pumped for them
and how dare these politicians be so mean to YOUR grandmothers,
and the threat disappears again for a few years.
Thanks!
Bill
Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
NODE 3a4902fbRe: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks.
"Raymond D. Mereniuk" <Raymond@fbn.bc.ca>Thu, 10 Sep 1998 11:35:00 +0800
Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com> wrote
> Just out of curiosity what are prices around where you guys live?
In the Vancouver BC area they are trying to raise the price and the
new standard is CAN$0.549 per litre, or US$1.37 per US gallon.
Not difficult to find CAN$0.454/l or US$1.14/g. For the last few
weeks you could find CAN$0.399/l or US$1.00/g. I often go to
Blaine WA and the lowest available there is US$1.059. Gas in
Seattle WA is at least US$1.199.
> Ditto for militant vegans... it's one thing to do it for health reasons, it's
> another to be an asshole about killing fuzzy animals.. hey veggies are alive
> too. If you're gonna murder veggies to live, (whose growth results in the
> death of millions of insects who would devour the veggies if not for
> insecticides) you may as well quit being a hypocrite and murder animals too...
>
> The only way for a consciencious objecting vegan to not be a hypocrite is to
> simply stop eating and drinking and breathing... after all, every time he does
> so, he inhales, ingests, or otherwise murders billions of microbes... :)
Have you ever tried using this argument on a Vegetarian? I have
and they squirm in all directions attempting to rationalize their
irrational position. Basically some living things are more living than
others. Sort of reminds you of some politicians where it is obvious
from their actions that some people are more equal than other
people.
Virtually
Raymond D. Mereniuk
Raymond@fbn.bc.ca
NODE 14f39eebRe: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks.
Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>Thu, 10 Sep 1998 12:20:55 +0800
Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> In the Vancouver BC area they are trying to raise the price and the
> new standard is CAN$0.549 per litre, or US$1.37 per US gallon.
> Not difficult to find CAN$0.454/l or US$1.14/g. For the last few
> weeks you could find CAN$0.399/l or US$1.00/g. I often go to
> Blaine WA and the lowest available there is US$1.059. Gas in
> Seattle WA is at least US$1.199.
Bastards!
> Have you ever tried using this argument on a Vegetarian? I have
> and they squirm in all directions attempting to rationalize their
> irrational position. Basically some living things are more living than
> others. Sort of reminds you of some politicians where it is obvious
> from their actions that some people are more equal than other
> people.
Yep, and they can't figgure out what to say, so they just cop out saying it's
healthier. :)
--
=====================================Kaos=Keraunos=Kybernetos==============
.+.^.+.| Ray Arachelian |Prying open my 3rd eye. So good to see |./|\.
..\|/..|sunder@sundernet.com|you once again. I thought you were |/\|/\
<--*-->| ------------------ |hiding, and you thought that I had run |\/|\/
../|\..| "A toast to Odin, |away chasing the tail of dogma. I opened|.\|/.
.+.v.+.|God of screwdrivers"|my eye and there we were.... |.....
======================= http://www.sundernet.com ==========================
NODE fdc90a7cRe: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks.
Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:34:37 +0800
> Yep, and they can't figgure out what to say, so they just cop out saying it's healthier. :)
>
Julia Child, when asked to what she owed her longevity, replied:
"RED MEAT AND GIN"
Anyone got a good recipe for a New Orleans style bourbon steak?
NODE 830a4e95Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism (fwd)
"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>Wed, 9 Sep 1998 17:04:25 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <199809092123.OAA17355@leroy.fbn.bc.ca>, on 09/09/98
at 02:09 PM, "Raymond D. Mereniuk" <Raymond@fbn.bc.ca> said:
>William H. Geiger IIIwrote
>> Once an alternative fuel source is discovered that is more economical than
>> oil, the arabs will slip back into obscurity.
>Good point! Ever wonder why a decreasing commodity non-
>renewable resource is becoming cheaper as the known reserves become
>smaller?
>Maybe they want to sell it all before it becomes obsolete and maximize
>their income from that resource.
>Within the oil business I have heard this mentioned in regards to
>natural gas.
Most of these countries are economically "one trick ponies" and have
little export revenue outside of oil. Because OPEC <sp?> has been a
failure at enforcing production quotas there is a surplus of oil on the
market thus driving down the cost (supply and demand).
There are also large reserves of oil in Alaska, Siberia and elsewhere that
are going unused along with other reserves that are too expensive to
extract the oil at current market prices. The so called "oil shortage" of
the 70's had more to do with Oil Companies profiteering than it did with
any actual shortage. I have seen estimates in the past of our domestic oil
reserves showing that we have enough oil to last another 100 years at out
current rate of increased consumption if we stopped all imports today.
Simple economics is that it is cheaper for us to import it than it is to
produce it domestically.
As much as the Greens whine and cry about alternative fuels, the simple
fact is that as long as oil is cheap no one is going to switch.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: Windows? Homey don't play that!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNfb9g49Co1n+aLhhAQHHrQQAvX6z+/JeHTGzcT5PDdM+OeXOMcYDEIR3
mGm0I+R2Y0xzOgT01Z2h6DwJvy3e/bddd7+vFNUWuSCcbD33sFOO7psYWBgf2Vny
xtnlNLQDjI54QLye/XIugRaUI50pSgDC/SOytIr7swB9fSHbgPYUlTulRb+EV5xE
I0P5hjaPOzU=
=f5ED
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE b0489b5eRe: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism (fwd)
"Raymond D. Mereniuk" <Raymond@fbn.bc.ca>Wed, 9 Sep 1998 22:35:49 +0800
Petro <petro@playboy.com> wrote
>Could it be that certain large players (say, the U.K, U.S. Soviet
>Union &etc) have a vested interest in cheap oil as long as possible,
>sothey do things (like create the state of israel, and give it lots of
> economic aid) to destablize the region, keep the people of that area at
> each others throats &etc. so that OPEC can't agree to control prices...
>
> Nah, I'm just paranoid.
"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net> wrote
>Most of these countries are economically "one trick ponies" and
>have little export revenue outside of oil. Because OPEC <sp?> has
>been a failure at enforcing production quotas there is a surplus of
>oil on the market thus driving down the cost (supply and demand).
As William stated most of the OPEC nations are economic "one trick
ponies" whose leaders don't see the big picture and the benefits of a
cartel where all members co-operate. Israel was part of the
justification for screwing the world for more money in the so called
70s oil crisis. I would think that if the Arabs didn't have Israel to hate
they would find some other group.
If you go back to the late 40s you will find many political deals done
by the British which didn't make a lot of sense. The British walking
out of Burma and turning political control over to whoever the goofs
are that ruined that country made no sense whatsoever. The British
turned political control of Malaysia over to the ethnic Malays where
the Malays are not the original people of that region. The Malays
were immigrants much like most of the Chinese, they just got there
300 years earlier.
Falling oil prices probably hurt the USA and Soviet governments
more than any possible benefit. The Soviets export oil so they are
hurting. The US and most other western style democracies tax oil
products based on its wholesale cost and retail selling pricing so
they would see reduced revenues.
>There are also large reserves of oil in Alaska, Siberia and
>elsewhere that are going unused along with other reserves that are
>too expensive to extract the oil at current market prices. The so
>called "oil shortage" of the 70's had more to do with Oil Companies
>profiteering than it did with any actual shortage. I have seen
>estimates in the past of our domestic oil reserves showing that we
>have enough oil to last another 100 years at out current rate of
>increased consumption if we stopped all imports today. Simple
>economics is that it is cheaper for us to import it than it is to
>produce it domestically.
You can add possible large reserves in the Canadian Arctic. The oil
companies started to find it and they tried to think of a way to
transport it. The Canadian gov't vetoed all the transportation
alternatives so the oil companies stopped exploration.
The middle east countries do have the oil reserves with the lowest
cost of production. Most reserves in North American are moderate
to high cost of production.
Now if you want to be paranoid.... Before the 70s energy crisis we
all drove big cars which had no problem doing the 65 MPH speed
limit and back then we used to pass on two-lane highways. The
energy crisis came and we all accepted gutless foreign made small
cars which consumed less energy and had a problem with the 55
MPH speed limit and passing was impossible on a two-lane highway
even if we found a section which was not double-lined.
Now we have cheap oil. Big powerful vehicles are back and we are
not embarrassed to consume energy any more. I have no idea
where society is heading but I do like have a more powerful vehicle
which capable of passing a vehicle already doing 65 MPH.
>As much as the Greens whine and cry about alternative fuels, the
>simple fact is that as long as oil is cheap no one is going to switch.
The whole Greens or tree-hugger thing is a bit hypocritical. Ask
them if they have electrical appliances in their home and the answer
is always yes. For a number of years the Greenpeace fundraisers
would show up at the door asking for money to battle the forest
industry and the evil pulp mills which used chlorine in their bleaching
process and they would have white paper in their clipboards.
Virtually
Raymond D. Mereniuk
Raymond@fbn.bc.ca
NODE eb90a7e5Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism (fwd)
Petro <petro@playboy.com>Wed, 9 Sep 1998 23:28:15 +0800
At 11:22 PM -0500 9/8/98, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>In <199809082359.SAA12044@einstein.ssz.com>, on 09/08/98
> at 06:59 PM, Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com> said:
>
>>Forwarded message:
>
>>> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 18:17:45 -0500
>>> From: Petro <petro@playboy.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism
>
>>> planet and take all that fucking oil with them.
>
>>I wonder how the new realization that the calthrate deposits in the ocean
>>bottem off the continental shelf make fine fuel and it's replenishable
>>and may be of a larger quantity than the oil reserves will effect the
>>power balance.
>
>Once an alternative fuel source is discovered that is more economical than
>oil,
There already are several, the problem is the cannot be centralized
the way oil is.
Alcohol is acceptable (and in some ways better) than gasoline for
cars and motorcycles, but anyone can set up a still and compete with RDS &
Standard. A mix of solar, wind, coal, hydroelectric, nuclear and other
sources can provide most of the rest of the power we need. It is just a
matter of being willing to make the investment in the changeover.
> the arabs will slip back into obscurity.
Yeah, and the US will suddenly find that there is no longer an
reason to provide Isreal with HOW MUCH military support per year?
petro@playboy.com----for work related issues. I don't speak for Playboy.
petro@bounty.org-----for everthing else. They wouldn't like that.
They REALLY
Economic speech IS political speech. wouldn't like that.