NODE 1330179eRe: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>Thu, 8 Oct 1998 10:57:54 +0800
Forwarded message:
> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 22:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
> Subject: Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
> > Consider the difference in volume of these two waste products...
>
>
> Really? The amount of fuel that goes into a nuclear plant is farirly low,
> compared to the amount shoved into a coal plant.
Exactly my point.
A 1000MW coal plant produces approx 300,000 tons of waste product per year.
A nuclear plan produces .5. This means the concentration of the chemicals in
the coal plant are much lower by many orders of magnitude than the nuclear,
hence making the nuclear waste more toxic by a great deal.
____________________________________________________________________
The seeker is a finder.
Ancient Persian Proverb
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
NODE 834e8cc1Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
"James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>Thu, 8 Oct 1998 22:57:27 +0800
At 09:56 PM 10/7/98 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> A 1000MW coal plant produces approx 300,000 tons of waste
> product per year. A nuclear plan produces .5. This means
> the concentration of the chemicals in the coal plant are
> much lower by many orders of magnitude than the nuclear,
> hence making the nuclear waste more toxic by a great deal.
If dilution is an acceptable option, then we should just dump
nuclear waste in the ocean. In fact the Russians have been
doing that for many years, and no one has been able to
produce any suffering victims from the ocean dumping.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
8DBX+n7Cw8KUOOflsTi5CbjXTm3eCscPcNFfMjY
49Ej9qiN+YfvwjNFrr5TOXfcgeL8XcNHEMyCtoPNT
-----------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.
http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ James A. Donald
NODE 2cb35907Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
Michael Hohensee <mah248@is9.nyu.edu>Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:11:15 +0800
Jim Choate wrote:
>
> Forwarded message:
>
> > Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 22:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
> > Subject: Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
>
> > > Consider the difference in volume of these two waste products...
> >
> >
> > Really? The amount of fuel that goes into a nuclear plant is farirly low,
> > compared to the amount shoved into a coal plant.
>
> Exactly my point.
>
> A 1000MW coal plant produces approx 300,000 tons of waste product per year.
> A nuclear plan produces .5. This means the concentration of the chemicals in
> the coal plant are much lower by many orders of magnitude than the nuclear,
> hence making the nuclear waste more toxic by a great deal.
>
The latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Consider the
example of natural gas and gasoline. You don't get to conclude your
argument that easily! :)
Michael Hohensee