// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 1330179eRe: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
Forwarded message:

> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 22:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
> Subject: Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)

> > Consider the difference in volume of these two waste products...
> 
> 
> Really?  The amount of fuel that goes into a nuclear plant is farirly low,
> compared to the amount shoved into a coal plant.

Exactly my point.

A 1000MW coal plant produces approx 300,000 tons of waste product per year.
A nuclear plan produces .5. This means the concentration of the chemicals in
the coal plant are much lower by many orders of magnitude than the nuclear,
hence making the nuclear waste more toxic by a great deal.


    ____________________________________________________________________

                            The seeker is a finder.

                                     Ancient Persian Proverb

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
NODE 834e8cc1Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
At 09:56 PM 10/7/98 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> A 1000MW coal plant produces approx 300,000 tons of waste
> product per year. A nuclear plan produces .5. This means
> the concentration of the chemicals in the coal plant are
> much lower by many orders of magnitude than the nuclear, 
> hence making the nuclear waste more toxic by a great deal.

If dilution is an acceptable option, then we should just dump
nuclear waste in the ocean.  In fact the Russians have been
doing that for many years, and no one has been able to
produce any suffering victims from the ocean dumping. 

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     8DBX+n7Cw8KUOOflsTi5CbjXTm3eCscPcNFfMjY
     49Ej9qiN+YfvwjNFrr5TOXfcgeL8XcNHEMyCtoPNT
-----------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because 
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this 
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.


http://www.jim.com/jamesd/      James A. Donald
NODE 2cb35907Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
Jim Choate wrote:
> 
> Forwarded message:
> 
> > Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 22:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
> > Subject: Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
> 
> > > Consider the difference in volume of these two waste products...
> >
> >
> > Really?  The amount of fuel that goes into a nuclear plant is farirly low,
> > compared to the amount shoved into a coal plant.
> 
> Exactly my point.
> 
> A 1000MW coal plant produces approx 300,000 tons of waste product per year.
> A nuclear plan produces .5. This means the concentration of the chemicals in
> the coal plant are much lower by many orders of magnitude than the nuclear,
> hence making the nuclear waste more toxic by a great deal.
> 

The latter does not necessarily follow from the former.  Consider the
example of natural gas and gasoline.  You don't get to conclude your
argument that easily! :)

Michael Hohensee