Re: FW: rules of engagement (fwd)

Forwarded message:

> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:06:53 -0500
> From: Petro <petro@playboy.com>
> Subject: Re: FW: rules of engagement (fwd)

> I'm still about 8 days behind, so excuse the question:

No. (;)

> >> discussing at that meeting with members of EF Texas.  BTW: Whatever
> >> happended to the Classified Ad project??

> >I can still cover Austin, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Fort Worth, El Paso=

> 	I am not sure, but is this an idea to put the 3 line RSA Perl
> implementation in the classified adds? (as near as I could gather trying to
> read ahead) If not, what is it?

That is correct, it is the 3-line RSA proposal.


    ____________________________________________________________________
 
       To know what is right and not to do it is the worst cowardice.

                                                     Confucius

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim Choate:

What's the buzz in TX about the Bic-Assassins?

I spoke to a reporter at the Brownsville Herald who's
been covering the case and she says that local
folks think the men were entrapped by the government
with a sting.

Her story today and others previously at:

   http://www.brownsvilleherald.com

She sent me a copy of the indictment which cites a
confidential "source" which set up the E-mail system 
used to send threats to officials (the fink promised
the messages could not be traced - ouch!). The poor 
saps were videotaped throughout their planning 
and executing the threats, thanks to the informant's 
arrangements:

   http://jya.com/wge072198.htm

The informant is named in the court docket (which shows
that the defendants' attorneys put up a fierce fight
using First Amendment and other defenses discussed
here in regard to CJ):

   http://jya.com/usa-v-wise.htm

The judge's rulings favored the government consistently, 
though.

BTW, the prosecutor says that it made no difference that
nothing was ever done to act on the threats, no Bic-lighter
or bio-weapon was ever made, that it was enough under 
the law for the threat to have been made. "Justice was
done," he said of the conviction.