NODE c35ca20bReinsch On Crypto/Wassenaar
John Young <jya@pipeline.com>Wed, 9 Dec 1998 10:00:42 +0800
Excerpt from a speech by BXA's William Reinsch on December 7,
1998, at the Practising Law Institute conference "Coping with U.S.
Export Controls." Note final paragraph about detailed crypto
session today -- no report on that yet.
Full speech: http://jya.com/war120798-2.htm
Also by him yesterday on crypto: http://jya.com/war120798.htm
[Begin excerpt]
Encryption continues to be a hotly debated issue. As I stated last
year, the U.S. continues to support a balanced approach to encryption
policy which considers privacy and commercial interests as well as
protecting law enforcement and national security interests.
Furthermore, we also remain committed to promoting the growth of
global electronic commerce through secure financial and business
communications.
Our position has always been to seek industry-led, market-driven
solutions to achieve a balanced approach. What has changed is the
direction where technology and the market place are taking us. Key
recovery technology remains a very important part of our policy;
however, over the past two years, we have recognized that key recovery
is not a solution for all problems.
That recognition, brought about in part as a result of our ongoing
dialogue with industry, has helped us also focus on recoverable
technologies that can enable law enforcement to continue its
authorized activities.
As a result, on September 16, Vice President Gore unveiled a policy
update, which will not end the debate, but which does include steps to
further streamline exports of key recovery products and other
recoverable products which allow law enforcement, under proper legal
authority, recovery of plain text.
The update also provides for 1) the export of 56 bit DES worldwide to
any end user under a license exception; 2) exports of strong
encryption to U.S. companies and their subsidiaries under a license
exception; 3) exports of strong encryption to the insurance and
medical sectors in 45 countries under a license exception; and 4)
exports of strong encryption to secure on-line transactions between
on-line merchants and their customers in 45 countries under a license
exception. This is consistent with our earlier announcement relating
to financial institutions.
This is an evolutionary process and we intend to continue our
dialogue. We must continue to adapt to changes, and we will review
our policies again within the year to determine whether further
change is necessary. We intend to publish regulations implementing
the Vice President's announcement this month.
With respect to developing a common international approach to
encryption policy, Ambassador David Aaron, our special envoy on
cryptography, is working with other countries to ensure that our
policies are compatible. He has found that most major producing
countries have public safety and national security concerns similar
to ours and are interested in developing a harmonized international
approach regarding compatible infrastructures for electronic commerce
and for a key management infrastructure. At last week's Wassenaar
Arrangement plenary session, the participating states approved a
number of changes to modernize and improve multilateral encryption
export controls. These changes removed controls on products below
56 bits and on certain consumer entertainment systems, such as DVD
products, and on cordless phone systems designed for home or office
use.
Most important, participating states agreed to extend controls to
mass-market encryption exports above 64 bits, thus closing a
significant loophole. This will enable governments to review the
dissemination of the strongest encryption products that otherwise
might fall into the hands of rogue end users.
For those of you deeply interested in the details of our encryption
policy, we have a specific session devoted to it tomorrow.
[End excerpt]
NODE 19c418cfRe: Reinsch On Crypto/Wassenaar
Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>Wed, 9 Dec 1998 12:29:06 +0800
Note I have an article up at wired.com about Reinsch's speech yesterday on
crypto at a defense/critical inf event.
-Declan
At 08:16 PM 12-8-98 -0500, John Young wrote:
>Excerpt from a speech by BXA's William Reinsch on December 7,
>1998, at the Practising Law Institute conference "Coping with U.S.
>Export Controls." Note final paragraph about detailed crypto
>session today -- no report on that yet.
>
>Full speech: http://jya.com/war120798-2.htm
>
>Also by him yesterday on crypto: http://jya.com/war120798.htm
>
>[Begin excerpt]
>
>Encryption continues to be a hotly debated issue. As I stated last
>year, the U.S. continues to support a balanced approach to encryption
>policy which considers privacy and commercial interests as well as
>protecting law enforcement and national security interests.
>Furthermore, we also remain committed to promoting the growth of
>global electronic commerce through secure financial and business
>communications.
>
>Our position has always been to seek industry-led, market-driven
>solutions to achieve a balanced approach. What has changed is the
>direction where technology and the market place are taking us. Key
>recovery technology remains a very important part of our policy;
>however, over the past two years, we have recognized that key recovery
>is not a solution for all problems.
>
>That recognition, brought about in part as a result of our ongoing
>dialogue with industry, has helped us also focus on recoverable
>technologies that can enable law enforcement to continue its
>authorized activities.
>
>As a result, on September 16, Vice President Gore unveiled a policy
>update, which will not end the debate, but which does include steps to
>further streamline exports of key recovery products and other
>recoverable products which allow law enforcement, under proper legal
>authority, recovery of plain text.
>
>The update also provides for 1) the export of 56 bit DES worldwide to
>any end user under a license exception; 2) exports of strong
>encryption to U.S. companies and their subsidiaries under a license
>exception; 3) exports of strong encryption to the insurance and
>medical sectors in 45 countries under a license exception; and 4)
>exports of strong encryption to secure on-line transactions between
>on-line merchants and their customers in 45 countries under a license
>exception. This is consistent with our earlier announcement relating
>to financial institutions.
>
>This is an evolutionary process and we intend to continue our
>dialogue. We must continue to adapt to changes, and we will review
>our policies again within the year to determine whether further
>change is necessary. We intend to publish regulations implementing
>the Vice President's announcement this month.
>
>With respect to developing a common international approach to
>encryption policy, Ambassador David Aaron, our special envoy on
>cryptography, is working with other countries to ensure that our
>policies are compatible. He has found that most major producing
>countries have public safety and national security concerns similar
>to ours and are interested in developing a harmonized international
>approach regarding compatible infrastructures for electronic commerce
>and for a key management infrastructure. At last week's Wassenaar
>Arrangement plenary session, the participating states approved a
>number of changes to modernize and improve multilateral encryption
>export controls. These changes removed controls on products below
>56 bits and on certain consumer entertainment systems, such as DVD
>products, and on cordless phone systems designed for home or office
>use.
>
>Most important, participating states agreed to extend controls to
>mass-market encryption exports above 64 bits, thus closing a
>significant loophole. This will enable governments to review the
>dissemination of the strongest encryption products that otherwise
>might fall into the hands of rogue end users.
>
>For those of you deeply interested in the details of our encryption
>policy, we have a specific session devoted to it tomorrow.
>
>[End excerpt]
>