DARPA's Active Network page (fwd)

Forwarded message:

> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 17:50:56 -0500
> From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
> Subject: DARPA's Active Network page

> I saw an article on this in InfoWorld. NAI/TIS and DARPA talking about
> putting self-switching packets into the network. I don't see this as too
> far off from packets purchasing their passage across the network with
> micromoney of some kind.

How does the packet know what is a good price or a bad price as it makes
each hop? Whose processor is it using to run its program to evaluate the
costs? Who pays for that processor cost on a node that isn't selected? Who
has access to the audit trail? How does a reliable copy get back to the
originator? How does it do this in an anonymous network?


    ____________________________________________________________________

          What raises the standard of living may well diminish the
          quality of life.

                                                 The Club of Rome

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim Choate wrote:
> 
> Forwarded message:
> 
> > Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 17:50:56 -0500
> > From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
> > Subject: DARPA's Active Network page
> 
> > I saw an article on this in InfoWorld. NAI/TIS and DARPA talking about
> > putting self-switching packets into the network. I don't see this as too
> > far off from packets purchasing their passage across the network with
> > micromoney of some kind.
> 
> How does the packet know what is a good price or a bad price as it makes
> each hop? Whose processor is it using to run its program to evaluate the
> costs? Who pays for that processor cost on a node that isn't selected? Who
> has access to the audit trail? How does a reliable copy get back to the
> originator? How does it do this in an anonymous network?

Joy, just what we needed, a twist on the old source-routing packets.  A bad
idea within a bad idea. :(  Gee, how many of your routers allow source routed
packets these days?

To add to the above question, how big will the over head of the packets be?
How will the routers know that the packets aren't forged and that they contain
real micromoney and not already spent micromoney (possibly for the purposes of
denial of service attacks or other hacking attempts)?  
How will they do this in real time and not incur huge propagation delays?


IMHO, This has the words "Stupid Idea" written all over it.


-- 
----------------------------  Kaos Keraunos Kybernetos  -------------------
 + ^ +        Sunder          "The   real aim  of current policy is to /|\
  \|/    sunder@sunder.net    ensure the continued effectiveness of   /\|/\
<--*--> ALLOW FREE EXPORT OF  US information warfare assets against   \/|\/
  /|\   STRONG CRYPTOGRAPHY!  individuals,businesses and governments   \|/
 + v +  PROTEST WASSENAAR!!!  in Europe and elsewhere"  -- Ross Anderson
------------------------------ http://www.sunder.net ----------------------

RESTRICTED DATA - This material contains RESTRICTED DATA as defined in
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. Unauthorized disclosure subject to 
administrative and criminal sanctions.  NOFORN ORCON WNINTEL SIOP-ESI CNWDI